Reported judgments
Reported judgments.
16 reported judgments as counsel and 7 as Acting Judge of the High Court. Excludes SAFLII / JOL / JDR appearances as counsel; some Acting-Judge SAFLII judgments are included.
As counsel
South African Law Reports
Boss Logistics v Phopi and Others
Land Claims Court
2012 (3) SA 409 (LCJ)
MV Hua Qiang: Kalahari Mining Logistics and Others v Wilest International
KwaZulu-Natal High Court
2013 (5) SA 12 (KZD)
Dexgroup (Pty) Ltd v Trustco Group International (Pty) Ltd
Supreme Court of Appeal
2013 (6) SA 520 (SCA)
Stransham-Ford v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Gauteng Division (Pretoria)
2015 (4) SA 50 (GP)
G4S Cash Solutions (SA) v Zandspruit Cash & Carry
Supreme Court of Appeal
2017 (2) SA 24 (SCA)
Minister of Justice and Others v Estate Stransham-Ford
Supreme Court of Appeal
2017 (3) SA 152 (SCA)
OGOD v Laerskool Randhart and Others
Gauteng Local Division (Johannesburg)
2017 (6) SA 129 (GJ)
Cradle City (Pty) Ltd v Lindley Farm 528 (Pty) Ltd
Supreme Court of Appeal
2018 (3) SA 65 (SCA)
Fransch v Premier, Gauteng Province
Gauteng Local Division (Johannesburg)
2019 (1) SA 247 (GJ)
Liberty Group Ltd v Illman
Supreme Court of Appeal
2020 (5) SA 397 (SCA)
Reiscor Two (Pty) Ltd (in Business Rescue) v Anheuser-Busch Inbev Africa
Gauteng Local Division (Johannesburg)
2025 (1) SA 315 (GJ)
All South African Law Reports
Holcim (South Africa) v Prudent Investors
Supreme Court of Appeal
[2011] 1 All SA 364 (SCA)
Mullane and Another v Smith and Others
Gauteng Local Division (Johannesburg)
[2015] 3 All SA 230 (GJ)
Raubex Construction (Pty) Ltd v Bryte Insurance Company
Supreme Court of Appeal
[2019] 2 All SA 322 (SCA)
Wintercastle Trading 44 v Ringopro
North West High Court (Mahikeng)
[2023] 4 All SA 257 (NWM)
Labour Reports
NUMSA obo Dhludhlu and Others v Marley Pipe Systems SA
Labour Appeal Court
(2021) 42 ILJ 1924 (LAC); [2021] 9 BLLR 894 (LAC)
As Acting Judge
Reported judgments delivered while sitting as Acting Judge of the High Court of South Africa. Each entry includes the principal issue.
City Power (SOC) Ltd v Combined Private Investigations CC
Gauteng Division (Pretoria)
[2020] ZAGPPHC 679; 2021 (3) SA 202 (GP)
Established that a court is obliged to mero motu raise the principle of legality.
Read on SAFLIIK.C.M.D v B.N.D and Another
Gauteng Division (Pretoria)
[2020] ZAGPPHC 677
Applied the interest-of-justice test in granting condonation in a rescission application.
Read on SAFLIILeysath v Legal Practitioners Fidelity Fund Board of Control
Gauteng Division (Pretoria)
[2021] ZAGPPHC 7
Confirmed the relationships between counsel, attorneys and clients regarding trust-account funds.
Read on SAFLIIJoubert and Another v City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Gauteng Division (Pretoria)
[2021] ZAGPPHC 3
Section 3 condonation, Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act 40 of 2002 — refused.
Read on SAFLIIMAN Financial Services (SA) v Elsologix
Gauteng Local Division (Johannesburg)
[2021] ZAGPJHC 655
Application for return of a moveable asset — interpretation of contractual provisions.
Read on SAFLIIQelesile and Another v Road Accident Fund
Gauteng Local Division (Johannesburg)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 221
Rule 34A interim payments — concession of negligence alone is insufficient.
Read on SAFLIIStandard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Makaula and Another
Gauteng Local Division (Johannesburg)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 519
Default judgment — affidavit commissioned by an interested attorney; bound by S v van Schalkwyk 1966 (1) SA 172 (T).
Read on SAFLII
Briefing on a matter in a similar field?
Send a briefSource: April 2025 Silk-application annexure HPvN5. For in-depth discussion of selected matters, see In-depth matters.